Dear Outside Magazine,
Upon reading the story of Chris McCandless it is almost impossible not to admire the way McCandless took hold of his life and chased after his dreams. Hearing about his life has caused me to wonder if I would ever have the courage to do the same—to change my life as drastically as he, for one aspiration. I understand a person’s need to follow the lifestyle that he or she truly desires, but there has to be some type of boundaries that you must follow. I appreciate McCandless’s love for nature, and his want to live off of the land, and become a “hunter and gatherer,” but a line has to be drawn somewhere between reality and an unrealistic daydream. Many young adults in their twenties go through the same phase that he did, and have a need to find out ‘who they are,’ and what their lives are ‘meant for.’ McCandless just took this self-actualization to an extreme. Your article says that growing up, he was a successful athlete, student, and came from an upper-middle class family. Maybe, because life up to that point had fallen so easily into his lap, he thought that his trip to
I don’t think the trip that McCandless took was a bad idea, or that his transcendentalist views on life are wrong, but instead I am frustrated with some of the decisions he made. Why didn’t he bring a decent map with him? Several times in the article Krakauer points out times when McCandless could have saved himself if he had brought along a map of the area he was in. Also, the fact that he cut himself off so abruptly from his family, even with what he found out about his father, bothers me. It is noble of someone to follow their dreams, and live the lifestyle that they choose, but you need to understand when you have to be realistic. If McCandless had brought along extra food, a map, had told people where he was going, or even gone with Gallien to get more supplies, he still would have been able to live out his fantasy, but maybe still be alive to talk about it.
4 comments:
Your first sentence is really what made me want to comment on your letter because I truly agree with it. I also support this thoughts and beliefs, as you do; I just think he could have taken a few more precautions, like a map. If he brought a backpack, it’s not like a map wouldn’t fit. It sounds like we are both equally frustrated with this decision of his. I do admire the fact that he caught and found his own food, while not bringing any of his own.
I don't entirely agree with your assessment of McCandless. He wished to prove to himself what he was capable of, regardless of cost, and not being completely prepared was part of that test. I think the fact that he lived for as long as he did without any sort of outside help warrants everyones' respect.
I think that youre post was well thought out, and I can sympathize with your frustration, but I also believe he would not have had it any other way. His motives in setting out was to ostrasize many of the believes in mainstream culture in order to achieve a journey of self fufillment, and I think that although you or I or many other people can not conceive of not bringing a map, that was the nature of Chris' journey as an outside member of mainstream culture.
Post a Comment